The phenomenological turn of hermeneutics according to Heidegger, Gadamer and Ricoeur
Main Article Content
Abstract
The text is the translation into Spanish of a chapter from Le tournant herméneutique de la phénoménologie that Professor Grondin has generously reviewed and corrected for this Dossier. The author argues in this book that the hermeneutical turn so much talked about is actually the name of a radicalization of the program and of the phenomenological view that shows itself attentive to the linguistic and historical condition of meaning. If the craftsman of this turn was, without a doubt, Heidegger, Grondin is convinced that it was already taking shape in Husserlian phenomenology itself. The thesis that underlies the entire book is the reciprocal need for both the phenomenological view and the hermeneutic view to give an account of our life situation. The section presented here explores how Heidegger, Gadamer and Ricoeur understood the relationship between phenomenology and hermeneutics to conclude that “A phenomenology without hermeneutics is blind and a hermeneutics without phenomenology remains empty”.
Translation by Alejandra Bertucci.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
AA. VV. (1970). Hermeneutik und Dialectik. Tubinga: Mohr Siebeck.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1985). Gesammelte Werke I. Tübingen: Morh Siebeck.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1996a). Véritéet méthode. París: Seuil.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1996b). Verdad y método I. Salamanca: Sígueme.
Greisch, J. (2000). Le cogito herméneutique. París: Vrin.
Greisch, J. (2001). El cogito herido. Buenos Aires: Jorge Baudino ediciones.
Grondin, J. (1999). Introduction à Hans-Georg Gadamer. París: CERF.
Grondin, J. (2003). Le tournant herméneutique de la phénoménologie. París: PUF. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.grond.2003.01
Grondin, J. (2008). De Gadamer à Ricoeur. Peut-on parler d’une conception commune de l’herméneutique? En G. Fiasse (Dir.), Paul Ricœur: De l’homme faillible à l’homme capable (pp. 37-62). París: PUF. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.fiass.2008.01.0037
Heidegger, M. (1927). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Heidegger, M. (1993). El Ser y el Tiempo. México D. F.: FCE.
Husserl, E., Sepp, H. R. y Nenon, T. (Ed.).(1989). Aufsätze und Vorträge. HusserlianaXXVII. Dordrecht-Boston-London: Kluwer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2553-3
Husserl, E. (1993). Notes sur Heidegger. París: Minuit.
Ricœur, P. y Gadamer, H.-G. [General discussion] (1982). The conflict of interpretations. En R. Bruzina y B. Wilshire, Phenomenology: Dialogues and Bridges (pp. 299-320). Albany: Suny Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/sspep1982826
Ricoeur, P. (1986). Du texte a l’action. París: Seuil. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14375/NP.9782020093774
Ricoeur, P. (1995a). La critique et la conviction. Entretiens avec François Azouvi et Marc de Launay. París: Calmann-Lévy.
Ricoeur, P. (1995b). Réflexion faite. Autobiographie intellectualle. París: Esprit.
Ricoeur, P. (1997). Autobiografía intelectual. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.
Ricoeur, P. (2003). Crítica y convicción. Entrevista con François Azouvi y Marc Launay. Madrid: Síntesis.
Ricoeur, P. (2010). Del texto a la acción. Buenos Aires: FCE.
von Bormann, C. (1986). Hermeneutik. En AA. VV. Theologische Realenzyklopädie (Vol. XV). Berlín: De Gruyter.