The overshadowing of needs

Main Article Content

John O'Neill

Abstract

Part of my purpose in this paper is analytical, to trace out a series of logical features of the concept of need and the way it contrasts with that of preference. My central purpose is more substantive – to bring out what is at stake in this shift from the language of needs to the language of preferences in the characterisation of sustainability. I will argue that the original Brundtland formulation of the concept of sustainability in terms of needs has both theoretical and practical virtues which disappear in the shift to the language of preferences. A needs-based approach is more alive to the plurality of different constituents of well-being, and the limits to the substitutability between different kinds of goods that current generation must pass on to future generations if human welfare is to be maintained. It better captures the nature and seriousness of the ethical obligations that are owed both to the poor in current generations and to future generations. Lastly, it provides a more adequate starting point for the acknowledgement of forms of human dependence and vulnerability that informs basic concerns with sustainability.


(Published as O'Neill, John (2010). The overshadowing of needs. En F. Rauschmayer, I. Omann & J. Frühman (Eds.), Sustainable development. Capabilities, needs and wellbeing (pp.25-42). Londres: Routledge. Trans. Julieta Elgarte. Reproduced with permission of Taylor & Francis Group.)


 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Traducciones

References

Alkire, S. (2002). Dimensions of human development, World Development, 30(2), 181–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00109-7

Alkire, S. (2006). Needs and capabilities. En S. Reader. The Philosophy of Need (pp. 229-251). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511599750.012

Arrow, K. (1997). Invaluable goods. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(2), 757–765.

Arrow, K. y Hahn, F. (1971). General Competitive Analysis. Holden-Day.

Barry, B. (1996). Circumstance of justice and future generations. En R. Sikora y B. Barry (eds.), Obligations to Future Generations. Cambridge.

Beckerman, W. (1994). Sustainable development: is it a useful concept? Environmental Values, 3(3), 191–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/096327199400300301

Beckerman, W. (2000). Review of Foster J. (ed.). Valuing Nature? Ethics, Economics and the Environment. Environmental Values, 9(1), 122–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/096327190000900114

Benson, J. (1983). Who is the autonomous man? Philosophy, 58(223), 5–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100056217

Daly, H.E. (1995). On Wilfred Beckerman’s critique of sustainable development. Environmental Values, 4(1), 49–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/096327199500400103

Fehér, F., Heller, A. & Márkus, G. (1983). Dictatorship over Needs: An Analysis of Soviet Societies. Oxford.

Finnis, J. (1980). Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford.

Forbes, G. (2002). Intensionality, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary 76, 75–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8349.00090

Hargreaves-Heap, S., Hollis, M., Lyons, B., Sugden, R. and Weale, A. (1992). The Theory of Choice: A Critical Guide. Oxford.

Harsanyi, J. (1982). Morality and the theory of rational behaviour. En A. Sen y B. Williams (eds.), Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press.

Haussman, D. (1992). What Are General Equilibrium Theories? Essays on Philosophy and Economic Methodology. Cambridge University Press.

Keat, R. (2000). Cultural Goods and the Limits of the Market. Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230595767

MacIntyre, A. (1999). Dependent Rational Animals. Duckworth.

Marmot, M. (2004). The Status Syndrome. Bloomsbury. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2004.00058.x

Marx, K. (1973). Grundrisse. Penguin.

Martinez-Alier, J. (1997). The merchandising of biodiversity, en T. Hayward & J. O’Neill (eds.), Justice, Property and the Environment: Social and Legal Perspectives. Aldershot.

Martinez-Alier, J. (2002). The Environmentalism of the Poor, Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781843765486

Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841286

O’Neill, J. (1998). The Market: Ethics, Knowledge and Politics. Routledge.

O’Neill, J. (2006). Need, humiliation and independence. En S. Reader (ed.), The Philosophy of Need, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supp. 57. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246100009152

O’Neill, J. (2007). Markets, Deliberation and Environment. Routledge.

O’Neill, J. (2008). Happiness and the good life. Environmental Values, 17(2), 125–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3197/096327108X303819

O’Neill, J. (2009). Labour, nature and dependence. En S. Moog & R. Stone (eds.), Nature, Social Relations and Human Needs: Essays in Honour of Ted Benton. Palgrave.

O’Neill, J., Holland, A. & Light, A. (2008). Environmental Values. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203495452

Pearce, D. (1993). Economic Values and the Natural World. Earthscan.

Pearce, D., Groom, B., Hepburn, C. y Condor, P. (2003). Valuing the future: recent advances in social discounting. World Economics 4(2), 121–141.

Pearce, D., Markandya, A. y Barbier, E. (1989). Blueprint for a Green Economy. Earthscan.

Pilger, J. (1998). Hidden Agendas. Vintage.

Reader, S. (2006a). The Philosophy of Need. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511599750

Reader, S. (2006b). Does a basic needs approach need capabilities? The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(3), 337–350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00259.x

Reader, S. (2007a). Needs and Moral Necessity. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203940266

Reader, S. (2007b). The other side of agency. Philosophy 82(4), 579–604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819107000162

Saul, J. (2002). Intensionality, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Suppl. 76, 101–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8349.00091

Sen, A. (1984). Resources, Values and Development. Blackwell.

Sen, A. (1995). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.

Shiva, V. (1992). Recovering the real meaning of sustainability, en D. Cooper and J. Palmer (eds.), The Environment in Question. Routledge.

Shue, H. (1993). Subsistence emissions and luxury emissions. Law and Policy, 15(1), 39–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.1993.tb00093.x

Smith, A. (1981 [1776]). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Liberty Press.

Smith, A. (1982 [1762–1764]) Lectures on Jurisprudence. Liberty Press.

Spash, C.L. (1993). Economics, ethics, and long-term environmental damages. Environmental Ethics, 15(2), 117–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics199315227

Spash, C.L. (1994). Double CO2 and beyond: benefits, costs and compensation. Ecological Economics, 10(1), 27–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(94)90034-5

Spash, C.L. (1998). Investigating individual motives for environmental action: lexicographic preferences, beliefs and attitudes. En J. Lemons, L. Westra & R. Goodland (eds.), Ecological Sustainability and Integrity: Concepts and Approaches (pp. 46-62). Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1337-5_4

Spash, C.L. (2002). Greenhouse Economics: Value and Ethics. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203209059

Steiner, H. (1994). An Essay on Rights. Blackwell.

Thompson, G. (1987). Needs. Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Todes, S. (2001). Body and World. MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1641.001.0001

Walsh, V. (1970). Introduction to Contemporary Microeconomics. McGraw-Hill.

Wiggins, D. (1998). The claims of need. En D. Wiggins (ed.), Needs, Values, Truth. Clarendon Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198237198.001.0001

Walsh, V. (2005). An idea we cannot do without. Royal Institute of Philosophy, 80(57), 25–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246100009139

WCED (United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development) (1987). Our Common Future. www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm