Against the asepsis of the world. Merleau-Ponty's late ontology and the problematic of flesh

Main Article Content

Nicolás Fagioli

Abstract

This paper proposes a reading strategy for Merleau-Ponty's complex late reflections on the concept of flesh. It will be sustained in the development of this paper that this notion must be understood from the characteristics of the type of ontology that the author intends to build and from the distinctive notes of its object of study. Once these concepts are made explicit, they function as an exegetical framework for the problem of flesh and as an ordering guide for the elements that compose it. According to this premise, the work consists of three parts. In first place, what we consider to be the main features of the merleau-pontian ontology of his last years of production and the way in which it is configured to position sensory experience as a legitimate object of study will be exposed. In the second and third parts, through the prism of what has been developed, the question about flesh will be analyzed based on a specific reading proposal that involves a specific dynamic between the concepts of difference and unity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Fagioli, N. (2023). Against the asepsis of the world. Merleau-Ponty’s late ontology and the problematic of flesh. Revista De Filosofía (La Plata), 53(2), e089. https://doi.org/10.24215/29533392e089
Section
Artículos

References

Abram, D. (1998). The Spell of the Sensuous. Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human World. Nueva York: Vintage Books.

Alloa, E. (2009). La resistencia de lo sensible. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.

Alloa, E. (2013). The Diacritical Nature of Meaning: Merleau-Ponty with Saussure. Chiasmi International, 15, 167-181.

Barbaras, R. (2004). The Being of the Phenomenon. Merleau-Ponty’s Ontology. Indiana: Indiana University Press.

Carbone, M. (2015). The Flesh of Images. Merleau-Ponty between Painting and Cinema. Nueva York: New York University Press.

Dastur, F. (2000). World, Flesh, Vision. En F. Evans y L. Lawlor (Ed.), Chiasms: Merleau-Ponty’s Notion of Flesh (pp. 23-50). State University of New York Press.

De Souza Chauí, M. (1981). Merleau-Ponty. La experiencia del pensamiento. Buenos Aires: Colihue.

Evans, F. y Lawlor, L. (2000). Chiasms: Merleau-Ponty’s Notion of Flesh. Nueva York: State University of New York Press.

García, E. (2012). Maurice Merleau-Ponty. Filosofía, corporalidad y percepción. Buenos Aires: Rhesis.

Hamrick, W. S. y Van der Veken, J. (2011). Nature and Logos. A Whiteheadian Key to Merleau-Ponty’s Fundamental Thought. Nueva York: New York University Press.

Hass, L. (2008). Merleau-Ponty´s Philosophy. Indiana: Indiana University Press.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). L’oeil et l’esprit. París: Gallimard.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1993). Fenomenología de la percepción. Madrid: Planeta.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2010). Lo visible y lo invisible. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.

Ralón, G. (2017). La noción de institución como apertura de un campo. Escritos de filosofía,5, 16-22.

Ramírez, M. T. (2013). La filosofía del quiasmo. Introducción al pensamiento de Maurice Merleau Ponty. México D. F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Toadvine, T. (2009). Merleau-Ponty's Philosophy of Nature. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Toadvine, T. (2012). The Chiasm. En S. Luft y S. Overgaard (Ed.), The Routledge Companion to Phenomenology (pp. 336-347). Routledge.